Following on from Randy’s last article on Thailand,
\n here he offers some advice on eco tourism in Thailand. <\/p>\n
\n Finding real eco tourism in Thailand can be difficult. Here are a few
\n guidelines.<\/p>\n
\n It seems everyone is doing Eco tours and treks but what is it? Do you know
\n the questions to ask a tour or trekking operator to find out if they are for
\n real or just a ploy to get you to go with them?<\/p>\n
\n First of all, most operators care only about making you happy. They will say
\n yes to what ever you want to do. This is fine if you are doing a normal
\n commercial tour to the handicraft factories or city tour however if you want
\n to visit a hill tribe village or a nature area this is not acceptable. The
\n reason is because that is what the consumer wants and the operators want to
\n meet the needs of their clients, which might not be in the best interest for
\n the environment or local people. This means it is up to you to be well
\n informed about what is and what is not eco-tourism.<\/p>\n
\n Here is a list of subjects and whys that separates the Eco-culture and nature
\n friendly tour and trekking operators from those that are not. It is then up
\n to you to decide which companies properly adhere to the true meaning of
\n Eco-tourism in Thailand.<\/p>\n
\n Tour and Trekking operators first must meet three basic standards to be
\n called Eco tourism.<\/p>\n
\n Did you know that most of the plants and animals on the endangered species
\n list are because of destruction of habit and not poaching, hunting or
\n gathering? There are many examples of this in north Thailand. Not so many
\n years ago there were lots of rare species of birds along the Mae Kok, Ping,
\n Fang and Mae Teang rivers. Now because of clear cutting of bamboo for tourist
\n for rafting all of the large and many rare species of bamboo are now gone.
\n This means no more places for the birds to roost or nest, insects to eat and
\n the beautiful stands of bamboo that were once abundant along the river banks
\n are now gone forever.<\/p>\n
\n So what can you do?<\/b>
\n Try to find operators that use recycled bamboo rafts when ever possible They
\n pick them up at the take out point and bring them back to the starting point
\n by large truck. The rafts can be used again and again for a year or so.
\n Others just take them to the end of the rafting trip and sell them for other
\n uses or most are disposed of along the bank to rot and they cut fresh bamboo
\n for new ones. Finding these operators will be difficult, as many tour
\n operators will say yes they reuse the rafts when in fact you will find out at
\n the end of your rafting trip they do not. Better yet find an operator that
\n use rubber boats, kayaks or canoes with out gasoline engines if possible.<\/p>\n
\n Another major problem is water pollution. With the large numbers of travellers
\n wanting to trek and visit hill tribe villages they are the number 1 source of
\n water pollution in remote areas. I know of many hill tribe villagers that
\n used to go to streams for small fish, frogs and insects to gather and eat.
\n Because of the trekkers using soap and shampoo at waterfalls and in streams
\n the animals that depend on clean water along with the plant life that
\n supports them are now gone. It is a fact that the hill tribe villagers before
\n the tourists arrived used to gather the water and wash their clothes and body
\n away from the streams or waterfalls so as not to pollute. Many villages now
\n also use the streams to wash in because they know there is nothing left to
\n gather or fish for. They don’t know why everything is gone but it was
\n all-fine before the tourists arrived. They also figure if the well-educated,
\n smart and rich tourists are using the water to bath why should we carry water
\n when we can just do what they do.<\/p>\n
\n So what can you do?<\/b>
\n Do not bath in streams or waterfalls using chemical soaps and shampoos. There
\n are biodegradable soaps and shampoos made that do not pollute so use these
\n products. Another thing you can do is to carry the water down hill and away
\n from the stream at least 20 meters. The best is not to use soap or shampoo at
\n all while in or near the stream or waterfalls. Bring along a face cloth and
\n add a little soap to clean your body and rinse off far away from the water
\n source. <\/p>\n
\n The people who lived in the rain forest or jungle knew in the past how
\n important their water source was. It is a tragedy that these peoples had to
\n give this up because of tourism. There are still several villages in Thailand
\n that are pristine and still follow these good environmental practices. Their
\n villages are in very remote areas far away from the normal tourist crowds.<\/p>\n
\n These are the two main problems with tourism and the environment in Thailand
\n today. For sure there are many others such as waste disposal that most of us
\n already know about.<\/p>\n
\n These are the worst horror stories not only in Thailand but also throughout
\n the world today. Almost all of the villages visited by tour operators today
\n have lost everything their elders have taught them going back hundreds of
\n years. Villagers are starving, addicted to drugs and they are selling their
\n children to be used as prostitutes or slaves. Believe it or not the villages
\n that accept tourists have the biggest chance of falling into this problem. Here
\n are the ways it usually (but not always) happens.<\/p>\n
\n A guide goes out looking for a new area and villages to take tourists. He (or
\n she) meets the people in the villages and wants to bring tourists with the
\n promise of a more prosperous life (money) than what they have now. There are
\n no rules or guide lines set except that the villagers can sell trinkets and
\n handicrafts (most bought and not made by them) to the tourists. The family
\n that has guests overnight receives a small sum of money, a meal but must supply
\n the rice (in most cases). If the villagers can supply opium for the trekkers
\n to smoke, so much the better, as the guide will make lots of money from this.
\n Once this starts the local drug lords will make them keep purchasing the
\n opium.<\/p>\n
\n After a year or two here is what happens to this once beautiful village. The
\n once shy villagers rush to meet the tourists with souvenirs for them to buy.
\n Most of these are made in Burma and not by the villagers themselves. They
\n will not stop bothering people until they buy something and then leave. The
\n children ask and beg for money. Now, the villagers are looking at the
\n tourist as a source of income not as a visitor. Most have quit working their
\n fields just to meet and beg and sell junk to the tourists. Most of the hill
\n tribe villages do not own land but are given an area to plant crops. If it is
\n not used then another village will take over the fields. This is usually a
\n nearby village that does not accept tourists. This means they no longer have
\n a place to plant seed for basic food to eat and sell.<\/p>\n
\n The guide starts dinner at the family home and gives the host family around
\n 50 Baht for having them. It is now evening and the guide asks who wants to
\n smoke opium. Some in the group will probably say yes. The guide then buys the
\n opium in the village for maybe 400 baht from which can supply around 20 or
\n more pipe loads. The guide then sells it again to the tourist for maybe
\n 100 to 200 baht a pipe load. This is big money for the guide. Mean while the
\n children in the village see the foreigners smoking opium and think that they
\n do the same everyday. In their mind they think they can smoke opium, go to
\n college and make lots of money like the tourists do. <\/p>\n
\n It is now a year later and the village has no culture to speak of any more.
\n There is no cultural interaction between the villagers and tourists as the
\n visitors are looked upon only as a source of income. The tour operator and
\n guides decide to now leave this village for new villages without tourists and
\n the process starts all over again. Now this village has no more tourists. They
\n have no place to plant crops anymore as the fields they stopped planting have
\n been taken over by nearby villagers. This means they now have to buy food
\n and basic necessities but have no money. Many are now addicted to opium or
\n heroin and even sell their children to keep up the habit.<\/p>\n
\n This is a worst-case example but has happened and continues to happen to this
\n day.<\/p>\n
\n So what can you do?<\/b>
\n Please be careful with trekking operators that advertise new area or village.
\n Find out why they have to go to a new village or area. Most good eco-culture
\n friendly operators go to the same area and villages year after year. They
\n have an excellent relationship with them so everything is in balance and
\n harmony so they do not need to go to a new area.<\/p>\n
\n Most hill tribe villages do not have handicrafts as they spend most of their
\n time working in their fields. There may however be elderly women in the
\n village taking care of young children that do make handicrafts. In this case
\n there will be one home or area where handicrafts can be viewed and bought. No
\n one will bother you to buy anything and you are not looked at as a major
\n source of income.<\/p>\n
\n Make sure you are not allowed to give candy to children or money for
\n pictures. As a matter of fact nothing should be exchanged directly between
\n you and anyone in the village. A village is a very communal place and what
\n belongs to one belongs to all. Jealousy and hate between villagers can arise
\n because one family or person received something from you and they
\n didn’t. It is true that many villages that are visited by tourist drop
\n drastically in population because of jealousy. It is the lucky ones that move
\n away to a different village, usually that of another family member that has already
\n moved because of marriage to a village member.<\/p>\n
\n Ask to meet your guide first. Talk alone with your guide. Find out how much
\n your guide knows about the village as you can. Tell your guide you want to
\n smoke opium and if he or she says no problem find a different operator and
\n guide. Many tour operators don’t know their guides are selling drugs to
\n tourists so you need to ask your guide. If you go on a trek and the guide
\n tries to sell pipe loads of opium and you see the tourists smoking turn the
\n guide into the tourist police as soon as you return to the city. Do not say
\n anything to the guide or tour operator just go to the police. This is the
\n only way this can be stopped.<\/p>\n
\n Ask how many persons are going on the trek with you and get it in writing as
\n part of your receipt. Many people are told a small number later to find out
\n there are up to 15 persons going on the trek. If they come to pick you up and
\n there is more than what they wrote on your receipt when you paid for the trek
\n get your money back. Go to the tourist police and file a complaint. If they
\n do not give you a refund just make sure you have the number of persons in
\n your trekking party written in your receipt. 6 persons should be the maximum
\n and the fewer the better and a private trek is best. An eco-culture tour and
\n trekking operator will keep the number of persons visiting a village small. The
\n impact of even 50 visitors a month in a village is devastating and should not
\n be allowed. Some excellent operators take visitor to village only once a week
\n and then no more than 6 persons. They have many villages they can visit so
\n they can take tourists daily to different villages. <\/p>\n
\n There are very few tour and adventure operators in Thailand that are willing
\n to support this belief. The ones that do started their business out of love
\n for nature and the people and wanting to share their experiences with travellers
\n not just for the money. They know the profits will rise once previous clients
\n talk to their friends and others about the wonderful time they had on their
\n holiday. This means more money for the locals and the tour operator. They
\n must work together without exploitation.<\/p>\n
\n The relationship that develops between the operator, guides, local people and
\n communities when the tour or trekking company helps them is very important.
\n This means you as a visitor can enjoy something special and richly rewarding
\n instead feeling like of a source of income. You can develop true friendships
\n with the people you meet and enjoy a spectacular natural unspoiled
\n environment. You and your guide will be well respected by everyone you come
\n in contact with. They also know that some of the money you paid for your
\n holiday to visit them goes to help them and the local environment. They know
\n their customs will be respected and their culture and way of life will remain
\n intact.<\/p>\n
\n Good Eco-aware tour operators help in many ways in Thailand. They buy books
\n and other supplies for local schools. They pay to build schools and pay for
\n teachers to live in the remote villages. They provide blankets and clothing
\n yearly to families and children. They pay for doctors to visit remote
\n villages on a regular basis and provide medicines and money for treatments if
\n needed. Some pay local remote villagers to keep a watch out for poachers in
\n the jungle and rain forest and report any potential problems to local
\n authorities. They also work with local police, park rangers and forest
\n ranges providing funds for rewards when poachers or tree cutters are caught.
\n They pay locals to plant trees where needed and teach the people about waste
\n disposal
\n and hygiene. Build toilet facilities and water wells or water gathering
\n reservoirs in small mountain canyons. They pay for pipes and plumping from
\n the wells and reservoirs to the village. The list goes on and on but the
\n important thing is the tour or trekking operator wants to help.<\/p>\n
\n So what can you do?<\/b>
\n Try to find such a tour or trekking operator. The most important thing is
\n being willing to pay more for you tour or trek. The fewer people on the trek
\n or tour the better the experience. This costs more but well worth it. Most
\n guides that work for these eco- culture friendly operators are very dedicated
\n to helping people including you. They go out and visit these villages and
\n natural areas regularly if they have people to take or not. They have
\n extensive training about the environment, animals, birds, insects and about
\n the local people you will see and meet. They are paid much more than the
\n normal commercial guide and are well worth it so be willing to pay more.<\/p>\n
\n There are certain places you should not visit, the main one being to see the Paduang
\n Long Neck Karen. This is one of the worst forms of tourism in Thailand. Any
\n tour operator who does this tour has no consideration for the culture or the
\n Karen People. Here is the real story. The original custom is that only a
\n girl born on a Wednesday during a full moon could where the rings around her
\n neck. Now because of the large number of tourists visiting these villages all
\n the girls are wearing the rings as it is big money. A Photograph of 1 girl is
\n as much as 500 baht. Not only that but the villagers are kept in a compound
\n surrounded by high walls so no one can see in. They are not allowed out of
\n the camp so everyone just sits around waiting for the tourists. It costs at
\n least 250 baht to get into the village which most goes to the tour operator.
\n Villagers have died in these compounds.
\n These people deserve more than this. <\/p>\n
\n Here is a short article from the English language Nation newspaper in Bangkok
\n on the seriousness of the problem. MAE HONG SON- A provincial court in Mae
\n Hong Son yesterday opened the trial of two Thai men on charges relating to
\n the detention and death of a long necked ethnic Padaung women, who, along
\n with over 30 others of the same ethnicity, was trafficked into Thailand from
\n Burma two years ago. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Paduang – commonly known here as the long-necked hill
\n people because the women normally wear brass necklaces, the number of which
\n increases over the years-has been a strong tourist attraction in Mae Hong
\n Son. The group of detained Padaung had been lured and trafficked from their
\n home village in northeastern Burma into Thailand by a Thai Karen agent, who
\n had pledged to take them to visit their relatives in Mae Hong Son. According
\n to the rescued Padaung, the woman, a mother of two, died in mid-1997 of
\n exhaustion and heartbreak as she had been long separated from her children
\n who remained in Burma. <\/p><\/blockquote>\nPlease boycott any agency that wants to take you to
\n see the Paduang Long Neck Karen.<\/p>\n\n Eco-tourism is not cheap so before you go out to find the best price for a
\n trek or tour, first think about who wins and who looses on a cheap tour or
\n trek. No one wins. Think about it. <\/p>\n